|
|
Post by paulayres on Nov 23, 2010 21:30:57 GMT
Changing too 422 with Craddock and Maclean as the front 2 is a winning system. The lack of offsides also became obvious with the front 2.
We have the players at the club, its the system that has been wrong.
If we do go on to win, keep the 442 with the same 2 up front and the same starting line up subject to injury too Wright.
Well done to the lads.
PS why bring on two subs win only 8mins left???
|
|
|
|
Post by malcolmnl on Nov 24, 2010 7:51:58 GMT
Changing too 422 with Craddock and Maclean as the front 2 is a winning system. The lack of offsides also became obvious with the front 2. We have the players at the club, its the system that has been wrong. If we do go on to win, keep the 442 with the same 2 up front and the same starting line up subject to injury too Wright. Well done to the lads. PS why bring on two subs win only 8mins left???Its a tactic called timewasting. Have you not noticed that team winning against us employ it a lot.  |
|
|
|
Post by paulayres on Nov 24, 2010 7:58:33 GMT
Changing too 422 with Craddock and Maclean as the front 2 is a winning system. The lack of offsides also became obvious with the front 2. We have the players at the club, its the system that has been wrong. If we do go on to win, keep the 442 with the same 2 up front and the same starting line up subject to injury too Wright. Well done to the lads. PS why bring on two subs win only 8mins left???Its a tactic called timewasting. Have you not noticed that team winning against us employ it a lot. It is also a risky tactic when the team is on top. It can backfire as it did at Luton last season. Paynes first touch nearly caused us to go down to 10 men. The team was on top and we did not need to bring on 2 subs at once. If time wasting was the ploy then bring one on and another in the last few mins not change 2 players at the same time. |
|
rsrp2
Full Member
Posts: 234
|
Post by rsrp2 on Nov 24, 2010 9:39:04 GMT
4-4-2 seemed much more effective last night and the likes of Craddock, McLean, Beano and Green would play better in such a formation.
|
|
|
|
Post by stevegilbert on Nov 24, 2010 10:00:45 GMT
just gone to throw in the mix that it was actually 4-1-4-1 with wootton infront of the back 4 and maclean up top on his own
|
|
|
|
Post by Brahma Bull on Nov 24, 2010 11:01:02 GMT
It started off as 4-1-4-1 before Wilder changed to 4-4-1-1 and 4-4-2. The performance really happened when we changed to 2 up top.
|
|
|
|
Post by dabigfella on Nov 24, 2010 11:37:32 GMT
I still think Wilder is thrashing around trying to find a system that suites the players he has gathered together. He doesn't really want to go away from 4-3-3, but he may be forced to now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Sennett on Nov 24, 2010 11:42:37 GMT
442 is what we'e been crying out for we looked like a different side. I think we can really push up the table if we stick to 442.
|
|
|
|
Post by tatabanya on Nov 24, 2010 11:52:44 GMT
I still think Wilder is thrashing around trying to find a system that suites the players he has gathered together. He doesn't really want to go away from 4-3-3, but he may be forced to now. dabigfella you really are miserable. Enjoy this! |
|
|
|
Post by SuperOx on Nov 24, 2010 14:58:45 GMT
CW took Heslop off late on becuase he had given everything and was looking
exceptionally tired.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oxo on Nov 24, 2010 17:07:36 GMT
Thats why that footballing Magazine is called 4-4-2!!
|
|
