|
|
Post by headingtonoldboy on Jan 3, 2011 15:27:01 GMT
Just logged on and saw the team. What strikes me is that we have a squad big enough and good enough (on paper) to enable CW to make 8 changes and still put out a decent side. I will go for 1-1.
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJ on Jan 3, 2011 15:27:07 GMT
Mention of deering being on loan at NC but nothing about his contract being terminated. It was registrations that had been changed for Deering and Beast, not contracts. They are both (at the moment) contracted to us. |
|
|
|
Post by 'Beav' on Jan 3, 2011 15:27:46 GMT
Tonkin babyyyyy. Don't lose your man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lone Gunman on Jan 3, 2011 15:28:02 GMT
Mention of deering being on loan at NC but nothing about his contract being terminated. It was registrations that had been changed for Deering and Beast, not contracts. They are both (at the moment) contracted to us. Which means the same thing doesn't it? |
|
|
|
Post by YellowJ on Jan 3, 2011 15:29:39 GMT
It was registrations that had been changed for Deering and Beast, not contracts. They are both (at the moment) contracted to us. Which means the same thing doesn't it? No, I don't think so. FA registrations would allow them to play for another club on loan. Contracts are between the player and the club. |
|
|
|
Post by Agadoo on Jan 3, 2011 15:29:43 GMT
Does Wilder pick players names out of a hat?
|
|
|
|
Post by ConcreteBob on Jan 3, 2011 15:29:50 GMT
Stevenage 3 up on Barnet.
|
|
|
|
Post by captainox on Jan 3, 2011 15:30:17 GMT
It was registrations that had been changed for Deering and Beast, not contracts. They are both (at the moment) contracted to us. Which means the same thing doesn't it? not sure - probably means something because of them dropping down to conference - perhaps not going permanant to those 2 clubs?? Day and Bulman both on loan in conference but always with view to a perm. to those clubs - no sign of them on that list? pure guess work |
|
|
|
Post by sihath on Jan 3, 2011 15:30:32 GMT
All the changes Wilder has made are, to me, justified. Based on Saturday's performances you could make a case for dropping Clarke. Goalies are always a bit more likely to be spared the chop. He's a very decent keeper who is going through a sticky patch. He'll come good.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowsuede on Jan 3, 2011 15:31:07 GMT
I really hope that Deering will be given the chance again, even if its just pre season.
|
|
|
|
Post by ConcreteBob on Jan 3, 2011 15:31:13 GMT
Sounds like Tonkin's having a bit of a mare....
|
|
|
|
Post by headlesspnub on Jan 3, 2011 15:31:16 GMT
Does Wilder pick players names out of a hat? Similar method to your posts? What would your starting 11 have been after Saturday? |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Gunman on Jan 3, 2011 15:31:21 GMT
Does Wilder pick players names out of a hat? Do you ever think before you type? |
|
|
|
Post by captainox on Jan 3, 2011 15:31:40 GMT
Mention of deering being on loan at NC but nothing about his contract being terminated. not in their 16 today |
|
|
|
Post by followtheox on Jan 3, 2011 15:32:53 GMT
All the changes Wilder has made are, to me, justified. Based on Saturday's performances you could make a case for dropping Clarke. Goalies are always a bit more likely to be spared the chop. He's a very decent keeper who is going through a sticky patch. He'll come good. A very sticky patch? He has made a couple of mistakes apart from that he has kept us in nearly every game this season! |
|
|
|
Post by ekon on Jan 3, 2011 15:33:02 GMT
what positions are Midson Craddock Hall & Green playing? Are we 4-3-3 & if so who is Left - Centre and R -side up top?
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowJ on Jan 3, 2011 15:35:03 GMT
what positions are Midson Craddock Hall & Green playing? Are we 4-3-3 & if so who is Left - Centre and R -side up top? Radio Ox said 4-3-3. I heard them mention Green on the right. |
|
|
|
Post by sihath on Jan 3, 2011 15:35:21 GMT
All the changes Wilder has made are, to me, justified. Based on Saturday's performances you could make a case for dropping Clarke. Goalies are always a bit more likely to be spared the chop. He's a very decent keeper who is going through a sticky patch. He'll come good. A very sticky patch? He has made a couple of mistakes apart from that he has kept us in nearly every game this season! Only a sticky patch. Not a very sticky patch. His standards have been so high since he has been here that a couple of mistakes have highlighted how good he normally is. |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Gunman on Jan 3, 2011 15:35:29 GMT
GET IN THERE!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by malcolmnl on Jan 3, 2011 15:35:32 GMT
YYYEEESSS Craddock
|
|
